Skip to main content
Uncategorized

Meet Leah “Lele” Bella

By December 8, 2025June 3rd, 2026No Comments
by Sara O’Connor, Railbird Creations’s CEO and Co-Editor-In-Chief

In a gaming landscape full of noise, ego, and corporate indifference, Leah “Lele” Bella stands out precisely because she never sought fame or attention—she sought justice.

Lele isn’t a politician, a lobbyist, or a paid spokesperson; she’s an everyday American who became a force of nature the moment she realized poker—the game that bonded her to her late father—and the gaming industry as a whole was under threat.

What began as a daughter’s love for the game that shaped her relationship with her father has turned into a full-scale, boots-on-the-ground fight for poker and the gaming industry’s very future. As lawmaker Senator Mike Crapo quietly slipped a crippling “phantom tax” into the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) that would punish recreational and professional players alike, Lele has become poker’s most unexpected watchdog. She writes and speaks to senators, mobilizes players, and drags the truth into public view.

In an industry where too many shrug, stall, or stay silent, Lele has become something rare: the gaming industry’s uncompromising advocate for freedom, fairness, and the right to play without government sleight-of-hand. She isn’t just sounding an alarm. She’s pushing the industry towards its fight for the freedom to play without punitive taxation disguised as policy.

I. Hero Story Origins: Lele’s Poker Identity, Advocacy, and Role in Our Poker Ecosystem

1. How did you first get introduced to poker, and what drew you in initially?

When he was alive, my father was my best friend. No one compared. No one could touch our bond.

When I was 17 years old, he taught me Texas Hold ‘Em. There are many types of poker variations you can play, and Texas Hold ‘Em was gaining popularity in Las Vegas, Nevada, so he taught our family how to play during our poker nights. Honestly, I was so bored at first and wanted to make the river card (the last card to be dealt in a hand) wild to spice things up! Over the next few weeks, he kept incorporating Hold ‘Em into our game nights. It didn’t take long before we stopped playing all other types of poker and focused exclusively on Hold ‘Em. We even set up mini tournaments where eight of us would play for $10 each, winner takes all. Those are the best memories I have with my father, and I treasure them dearly.

I lost my father at the early age of 59. He had a stroke at the poker table and died doing what he loved. Poker brought us together and gave us an unbreakable bond. I am forever indebted to poker because of these life-long priceless memories with him. Before we laid him for his final rest, I slipped a poker chip in his front shirt pocket. It represents our eternal poker connection.

His legacy and memory are why I work so hard to make sure poker is here to stay. If poker can even change one person’s life for the better like it did mine, then I consider the fight for our right to play worth it. I’ll battle for it every day; this is a fight I’m willing to take head on with everything my friends, colleagues, and myself have to give.

2. What is your professional background—both on the felt and in your broader career—and how does it shape how you approach the game and the industry as a whole today?

I’ve worn many creative hats in my life. I co-hosted a FM morning radio show near Pittsburgh, PA, served as a copywriter, and co-hosted a podcast for three years. I am also a certified mental health coach. When I’m not playing poker, I am coaching the mental side of poker! I pretty much eat, sleep and breathe poker!

Before I was in media, I was a top salesperson for Mobile Communications Inc. (MCI), which focused on selling long-distance packages and Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) internet service. Being a salesperson was instrumental for my poker development. I learned how to read people, especially their body language. It taught me how to become relentless – to keep pushing even when people say no. You can get turned down one hundred times, but then attempt number one hundred and one, becomes a yes. I apply that tenacity to this fight for our right to play poker without an unfair phantom tax, which I will talk more about in the following questions.

With poker, you have to keep trying and learning no matter how many times poker variance challenges you mentally (Note: Variance is the natural statistical fluctuation in a player’s monetary results, which will cause short-term wins and losses to deviate from long-term expected value). This fight to pass The Fair Accounting for Income Realized from Betting Earnings Taxation Act (the FAIR Bet Act) requires mental fortitude and perseverance. Poker mirrors “real” life in many ways. Tenacity and a ruthless drive to excellence will serve you well on and off the poker table.

3. How long have you been part of “Poker Twitter,” and how has that digital community influenced your understanding of the industry?

Honestly, I had no intention of joining Twitter/X for anything, let alone for poker. However, by February 2024, everyone I knew that was playing was getting more involved with the game digitally, and I didn’t want to miss out on the fun online. From my past work experience and to keep up with trends and changing dynamics, I knew I needed to start having some sort of social media presence. So, I joined.

I don’t necessarily like the spotlight, but starting a Twitter/X account is necessary for my work. I love seeing small poker accounts like mine and well-known professional poker players communicate amongst each other. Phil Hellmuth, arguably one of the top five best-known players these days, is a great example of involving himself in the dialogue with large and small accounts alike. Having someone with Phil’s prestige and experience engage with unknown recreational players means so much to me and those players.

Undoubtedly, the poker community is still trying to find their way when it comes to navigating social media. No one has quite mastered it yet. We’re getting closer and better day by day, but we’re still in our adolescent phase at best.

4. How have and do you contribute to the poker community today?

I’ve been playing consistently for almost 25 years, and I love giving back to our community. For example, I give free poker coaching sessions to those that are new to the game. I also have an amazing poker group chat, and anytime my friends in that chat need poker advice, I drop what I’m doing and help them. Lastly, and in some ways most importantly, I’m a huge advocate for making sure the FAIR Bet Act goes through. I also advocate for online poker to be accessible in all fifty states. To be known for these critical issues and more in the gaming industry gives me great pride.

5. What is your primary goal in the poker world, and what drives you and your mission?

My primary goal is to break the outdated and simply untrue stigma that poker is just for “degenerate gamblers.” Poker is a mind sport; it is now properly recognized as such. It takes skill, discipline, and is a far cry from a mere push of a button (like a slot machine). Unfortunately, and troublingly, our state officials and “big government” treat poker as if it’s the “gateway drug” to compulsive gambling. This is simply untrue. Unfairly, online poker is regulated in a mere six states! In comparison, and somewhat hypocritically, state officials allow sports betting in thirty-two or more states. This makes absolutely no sense.

6. What gaps or unmet needs do you see in the poker community that motivate your advocacy and who are you primarily advocating for?

Passage of the FAIR Bet Act is of paramount importance and affects everyone involved in the poker industry, making advocacy for the betterment of all a unifying and singular matter. A “phantom tax” on poker (and sports betting) must not be allowed. In essence, phantom taxes are found by comparing your taxable income to the amount of cash actually received, and spotting where you’ve been taxed on money you did not actually receive. This is patently unfair and constitutes governmental overreach into our pocketbooks.

Having regulated poker sites for Americans to use is also of paramount importance. Offshore sites, which is exactly where poker enthusiasts will go if this phantom tax passes and online sites are not made legal throughout the United States, are rife with several high risks, including (but not limited to) identity theft, fraud, drained bank accounts, and other unethical practices.

The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 (UIGEA) makes it illegal for banks and payment processors to move money related to unlawful internet gambling. Bluntly, our representative snuck this law into an unrelated security bill, and it’s still there and on the books as legal! Put simply, the UIGEA is one of the primary reasons that online poker isn’t legal, even though sports betting is blowing up in three times the number of states.

To make matters worse, in July 2025 and at the last second, Senator Mike Crapo from Idaho snuck in a law to the OBBB that only permits 90% of someone’s gambling losses to be deducted as opposed to the historically permitted 100%. In other words, Crapo’s sneaky efforts are contrary to the current law, which allows someone’s gambling losses to be deducted fully against one’s winnings in a taxable year. His efforts will affect all poker players, including recreational players like my father was. It’s an incredibly hard and (no pun intended) taxing battle to remove a law once it’s in place. We have an incredibly small window of time to get this taken out of the OBBB.

 

Senator Mike Crapo

Congresswoman Dina Titus from Las Vegas, Nevada introduced the FAIR Bet Act, for which I am an unwavering advocate. It will ensure that poker players (and other gaming participants) will not bear the unfair and currently largely unknown phantom tax from applying.

I’m advocating on behalf of everyone, especially those who don’t have a voice or the financial means to survive a phantom tax on their recreational pursuits. Many recreational players don’t realize yet that the looming phantom tax will affect them, leaving a fraction of the player pool shouting until their throats crack about the impending danger. Our voices are louder and stronger in numbers. This interview will hopefully educate and get more of our community to be active participants in the fight for their right to play without an unfair phantom tax.

7. Tell us about your advocacy work on behalf of poker so far—what concrete actions have you already taken?

I have taken many concrete actions, including (but not limited to):

  1. Creating a petition everyone in the United States should sign (https://t.co/zwmMBn0u1V), because stopping governmental overreach (particularly pertaining to unfair taxation) is as American as apple pie and baseball,
  2. Writing letters to senators on the FAIR Bet Act,
  3. Reaching out to politicians irrespective of political affiliation on social media, and,
  4. In the Spring of 2026, we are going directly to Washington, DC to lobby for our rights to play online poker.

Similar to how no politician wanted to touch the legalization of marijuana prior to 2012, no politician seems to want help in the fight to our legal right to play poker without an unfair and punitive phantom tax. We’ve got to be ruthlessly loud about stopping this tax until our efforts are successful.

When I learned about the phantom tax, the air left my lungs. It was immediately apparent to me that this could and may break the legal poker industry in America, which will also impact international tourism. Frankly, the industry is and players are suffering enough when it comes to the high rake (i.e., the scaled commission fee taken by a cardroom operating a poker game) and the brutal fact that a mere six states regulate online gaming. Adding a phantom tax on top of that is untenable.

Senator Mike Crapo’s phantom tax will affect professional and recreational players alike, albeit in different ways. It will bankrupt your average poker professional; they won’t have any return on their investment. As for the average recreational player, depending on how much they win, that could add up to tens of thousands in taxable income! This means they will pay out more in taxes and could have their total earned income increased. If a person is utilizing the Affordable Care Act (ACA), more commonly referred to as Obamacare, for health insurance coverage, this increase in total income earned could catapult them over the cap, resulting in them losing their health coverage and even jeopardizing their child tax credit!

Once the player pool’s financial and/or health benefits are affected, there will be a trickle-down impact (and possible floodgate) affecting everyone in poker’s ecosystem, from servers, to poker dealers, floor staff, and the casinos as a whole. The last time I checked, Senator Mike Crapo has yet to comment on why he put this law into the OBBB. I cannot and will not sit and watch what I love get decimated by inappropriate governmental overreach.

The fight continues irrespective of political (in)action, and it is slowly but surely gaining momentum by the people, for the people as we get closer to the date the unconscionable law will take effect if it is not stopped. If we don’t act now to stop the phantom tax, it’ll be almost impossible to remove it next year.

II. The FAIR Bet Act: The Stakes, Risks, and Urgency

8. For those who may be unfamiliar, what is the FAIR Bet Act, and what are its key provisions?

It’s a legislative proposal that deals with how players are taxed, from poker players, to blackjack enthusiasts, slot machine players, and sports betters. If it involves gambling (be it a mind and skill game like poker or another recreational pursuit like Blackjack, slots, or sports betting), you will be unfairly taxed.

Currently, the law allows players to deduct 100% of their losses against their winnings for federal tax purposes each year. The proposed FAIR Bet Act ensures it stays that way. Senator Mike Crapo snuck a law into the OBBB in July that changes our current tax rule to a person’s only being able to deduct 90% of one’s losses. The FAIR Bet Act would reverse Crapo’s law and take us back to the equitable 100% deduction. If the FAIR Bet Act isn’t passed, the 10% phantom tax will be a binding and enforceable law.

9. Who in the poker ecosystem will be most affected, and when will those effects begin to be felt?

The brutal reality is that this phantom tax will affect anybody who gambles in any form, poker or otherwise. Personally, I have so many sports betting friends who had no idea that this is going into effect. Imagine the shock and horror that will come tax time next year if the FAIR Bet Act is not passed. Simply put, it will cause panic and pain that won’t be recognized or felt until people begin filing their taxes in January through March of 2027. This is truly terrifying to those of us who have been paying attention and to those who are learning about this for the first time.

Once people realize they’re paying taxes on money they lost, there will be an uproar, but at that point it’ll be too late for everyone because the bill will have already been in effect for a year. It is extremely hard if not next to impossible to remove an item from a bill once it goes into effect. This is compounded by the fact that our representatives currently do not seem to want to touch it, no matter how many constituents of theirs it impacts.

Without passing the FAIR Bet Act, poker (and sports betting and other forms of gambling for pleasure or one’s profession) could be decimated to the point of nonexistence, making all other poker-related issues our passionate and diverse community cares about moot. This is an issue that unites all poker players and employees in the poker ecosystem, irrespective of political affiliation, religion, social status, and more.

Join the fight by signing the petition to pass the FAIR Bet Act (https://t.co/zwmMBn0u1V). Help to get rid of the unfair phantom tax before it is too late.

10. You’ve convinced me that this is of paramount importance. Besides signing the petition, what should we be doing as a community to help pass the FAIR Bet Act?

Everyone—from the most influential players and social media influencers to regulars and recreational players who have quietly been playing for years for social connections—needs to get loud. We need to be on the airwaves. We need to post about it every day. Anyone who wins a large tournament needs to have signage displaying “PASS THE FAIR BET ACT NOW” during their photoshoot. If there was a time to be vocal in our community, it’s now and about this.

I would love to see heavy-hitting players and personalities in the industry like Phil Hellmuth, Daniel Negreanu, Phil Ivey, and others make a serious public service announcement about this. We need to get on all of the social media platforms and spread awareness and get engagement growing. Frankly, there should be an infomercial during college football and NFL games so that sports betters learn about how they are undeniably going to be affected.

We need help from large accounts. We need help from medium accounts. We need help from the small accounts. The more vocal we are, the more likely the FAIR Bet Act will pass, thereby protecting us from the impending phantom tax.

11. If nothing is done and the community is uninformed, uninvolved, and fragmented, what is the worst-case scenario?

The worst-case scenario is that Crapo’s law will unequivocally drive poker enthusiasts to dangerous offshore sites. People will choose an illegal option if they think that it’s the only one available to them. This, in turn, will hurt casinos’, cardrooms’, and legal online sites’ profits, which will negatively impact, if not eliminate, the careers of people working for them.

If I were a betting woman (and I am), I predict that besides the players and their families, online sites will suffer the most. As an avid online player with a VIP account due to the amount I play, I have a representative assigned to me. I called her and asked what the online casino planned to do about the FAIR Bet Ac. I told her, “We need to be activists on this!” Troublingly, her discouraging response was, “We’re just taking it day by day.” This is alarming, to say the least, and incredibly shortsighted considering that they stand to risk a tremendous loss of players and profit. It also strongly suggests, if not outright demands, that we players and employed members of the industry take matters into our own hands, sign the petition (https://t.co/zwmMBn0u1V), and voraciously advocate for the passage of the FAIR Bet Act.

12. Which groups or individuals do you believe will be critical allies in fighting this legislation—and why?

Everyone has a vested interest in this. I say again – everyone must get involved. Even people outside of the poker and gambling industry should care, because phantom taxes impact and governmental overreach effects all of us in disastrous ways.

I truly thought gaming boards would be more vocal about this pressing issue, but, to my shock and dismay, they don’t seem to care. Perhaps they don’t yet care because transparency around this issue is largely non-existent. People are underestimating (or outright ignoring) how it will affect them. They are burying their heads in the sand and protecting themselves with a false sense of security that won’t be there come tax time in 2026.

The American Gaming Association (AGA), which addresses federal, legislative, and regulatory issues affecting its members, employees, and customers, and the Poker Player Alliance (PPA), which is an advocacy group for the rights of United States poker players, need to join the fray and fight. If they have been, they’re not loud enough, because I haven’t heard or seen anything and I’m looking for support everywhere I can.

This is fixable. We’re not too late. But time is running out.

III. Media, Storytelling, and Accountability

13. As someone who values storytelling and public messaging, what is your stance on the current state of poker journalism as a whole?

Even though poker is 125 years old, we are still in the infantile stages of online poker journalism — and that’s ok! There are only so many articles we can read and stomach on the six most popular poker professionals or about who won a specific tournament. Journalists and news sources need to ask: Does this article catch the eye of someone who’s not interested in poker? The answer needs to be yes. That’s the only way we grow.

We want something that catches everyone’s attention. We want something that makes us curious. Poker players’ minds are complex, and they love intrigue and problem solving.

Poker players know the value of a good story when playing a hand. Our actions during a game must tell a compelling story from start to finish – that is, from our pre-flop raises, to bet sizing, along with factors such as body language and spoken words utilized at the table. All of these contribute to and tell a story. We need to translate our storytelling to the written word in order to discuss legal issues. We must protect our community from improper governmental overreach.

We must tell compelling stories on and off the felt to not only sustain but grow the game. Imagine if we raised the exact same amount every pre-flop bet. Imagine if we bet the same size each hand we played. Simply put, that’s boring! It’s predictable! No good player would be foolish enough to do that. Yet, we’re writing poker articles in that format! Moreover, I am uninterested in attack-style articles that the mainstream media has been doing. It’s not good for our community. The in-house arguing is the worst look for poker, particularly at a time it is of paramount importance for us to be united. I find myself avoiding poker articles for these reasons, and I love everything about poker!

Right now, I’m interested, invested, and attracted to small online accounts. For example, I saw an online account with 70 followers, and the account creator shared a story of how before he broke his leg, he had never played poker in his life. Well, when he broke his leg, he couldn’t physically do anything besides sit on the couch and play poker online to keep his mind happy and engaged. Long story short, he just won his first tournament for $120. That’s a cool story, the kind that I want to read about!

It’s not that poker journalists shouldn’t cover top performers who won specific tournaments; however, it’s of paramount importance to give recreational players a chance to shine in the spotlight too. They are grinding hard (i.e., playing and studying) and deserve to be recognized. Moreover, they have the coolest stories; their “small” wins come with big stories that tug at your heartstrings. If you look on social media, their voices are there! You can easily find people posting about their four-figure wins and sharing how, mere months ago, they were in a dark place in their personal life and poker pulled them out and through! Further, there are amazing coaches that have posted their strategies and opinions, but, because they don’t have a huge following, they don’t get the credit they deserve. Bottom line, interesting stories are everywhere in poker; we just need the right writers to cover them!

No matter what, poker journalism will always be around. However, we can do so much more! Journalists who can figure how to attract non-poker players and keep the attention of players alike, all while breaking free of the cookie cutter content, will change how poker is perceived.

14. How familiar are you with my work, and what do you candidly think of it?

Honestly, the only work I’ve seen of yours was a recent op-ed article that PokerListings published. Frankly, I immediately said, “She’s getting a lot of attention for the wrong reasons.”

There’s a well-known and somewhat comically divisive poker player named Martin Kabrhel, who has a catch phrase for when something unexpected or wrong happens during a hand. He’ll shout and jokingly bemoan, “Not like thattttt!” That’s precisely how I felt about your work. We need your voice and voices like yours, but “not like that!” Right now, we need more pieces addressing paramount issues to all poker players, like the FAIR Bet Act, predatory rake rates, and online regulation in fifty states.

15. What would you like to see me—or any journalist—cover?

I want to see poker media create content on individuals with amazing stories, irrespective of how well-known, popular, or professional they are. I’ve only seen one media company put out a call for rags-to-riches stories, and I loved that! But we can go even further than that.

That’s the beauty of poker; the game itself is compelling, and it brings forth such a wide variety of people from vastly different backgrounds and life experiences. At one poker table alone, you can have, for example, businesspeople, stay-at-home parents, college students, retirees, government workers, and artists, sitting and playing a game together.

16. If you could reshape how poker media covers advocacy issues, what ideally would responsible coverage look like?

While we need the “edutainment” factor (i.e., content that is a mixture of education and entertainment) that already exists, it would be great if we had poker media dedicated to “the boring but necessary stuff” too. While this may sound like I’m contradicting myself, pieces about legislation and advocacy efforts in and by our community are just as important, if not more so.

It would be nice for journalists to keep us updated on these things. We need to be informed. There needs to be a go-to source for this, and, frankly, the more the merrier! If you do this already, please reach out to me on Twitter/X (@lelepokerr), because you need more exposure and my colleagues and I want to help you.

17. Do you think the poker media has failed the community on major issues? If so, how?

I don’t think that the poker media has failed the community per se. It’s in its infancy, i.e., a growing stage. It doesn’t yet know how to address major issues, at least not well. Unfortunately, like with any group of strong, passionate people, there can be in-fighting. This in-fighting then results in a large number of comments and more disagreements. Instead, I would love to see important issues being reported on and more players commenting and sharing on positive, community-building pieces. Issues of importance include but are not limited to the necessary passing of the FAIR Bet Act, making online poker legal and accessible across the country, and reducing the near impossibly high rake we are charged when playing. These are issues we need to be talking about in the poker community as a community. Everything else is just noise.

IV. Looking Ahead: Actionable Steps Readers Can and Must Take

18. If I’m a reader concerned about the FAIR Bet Act, what are practical, actionable things I can do today to make a difference?

First and foremost, sign and share the nationwide petition I started here (https://t.co/zwmMBn0u1V). Ask your friends and family to do the same, telling them how important this is to you. In fact, it affects them as well, considering they too may feel the impact when you must pay a phantom tax beginning in 2026.

On social media, get verbal and tag Representative Jason Smith (Twitter/X handle: @repjasonsmith). Representative Smith is the one who can get the House Ways and Means committee to schedule a hearing on the FAIR Bet Act. We have a small window, as holiday break starts on December 20th for Washington DC. The bright side (if you can call it that) is that Congress is in their lame duck session, which means there are no major elections at this time. This means that niche issues like a gambling tax could possibly get less pushback and go through easily.

WE MUST ACT NOW. Call Representative Jason Smith (phone number: (202-225-4404). You’ll be connected to one of his staff members. He has a wonderful staff, especially Vincent. He took the time to speak to me, answer my questions, and relayed my message to Representative Smith. He will do the same for you, and the call takes less than a minute!

We must bring this matter to Representative Smith and the Ways and Means Committee (Twitter/X handle: @waysandmeansgop). Otherwise, nothing will get done! Additionally, comment and support Representative Dina Titus’s account (Twitter/X handle: @repdinatitus) and encourage her to continue working and updating us on her Act.

 

Representative Dina Titus

19. What will success look like to you? What specific outcomes are you fighting for?

Achieving success will mean that the phantom tax was stopped from going into effect in 2026. Additionally, in the new year, I’m pushing for state expansion of online poker sites for the betterment of all. Finally, I want to advocate more for stroke awareness since my dad died at the poker table and yours (Sara) is in the hospital right now after experiencing and surviving a stroke. One day soon, I’d like to advocate for stroke and heart attack awareness in poker rooms by, for example, teaming up with health care companies to help with this issue.

V. Final Reflection

20. What, if anything, keeps you hopeful at a time when many players and industry insiders feel discouraged or powerless?

My hope comes from the fact that poker has withstood the test of time. Not only are we survivors, but we frankly thrive in hostile and heavily competitive environments. Most of us love it.

This isn’t the first time that there has been governmental overreach by a politician or a small contingency that tries to take us down. But we Americans love our freedom, including the freedom to play a game and to not be taxed (especially by a phantom tax snuck into a bill in secret) without representation.

What I know to be true is this: The ones that are fighting will keep fighting against the unfair treatment that is happening to poker players when it comes to bureaucratic red tape. I know that poker journalism will find its way through the thicket and has the potential to be more interesting than ever before. I know that once poker gets inside your veins, it’s in your blood forever and you can’t help but to be a part of it. That’s how I stay hopeful, because, in the end, you can’t destroy energy and no one can stifle or snuff out the American spirit.

Poker players are resilient and relentless. Improper governmental overreach will not be our death sentence. We will not be stopped.

21. What legacy do you ultimately want your advocacy to leave on the poker world?

Poker has been there for me in my darkest hours. It has shown me such light and strength. It’s given me my best memories. For those and many more reasons, I try to be a poker philanthropist. I offer free coaching to new players. I advocate behind the scenes to keep poker going. I am leading the charge to expand the poker playing field online to all fifty states, in order to promote safety, fairness, and accountability (among other things). I also want to and will continue with my health advocacy efforts.

When you boil it all down, poker has kept my dad’s memory alive, and I will pay that forward by helping keep poker alive in America. Poker philanthropy is my passion, my goal, and a lifelong pursuit. I hope and work hard for it to be my legacy.

Closing Thoughts

Leah “Lele” Bella stands at the center of a battle of which most players are, at this time, unaware. For Lele, this fight is personal, but its impact touches the average American who enjoys or works in the gaming industry. She is unyielding because she knows what’s at stake—not just the fate of live and online poker, but the livelihoods of players, the safety of consumers, and the integrity of an entire industry. Her advocacy is a reminder that one person with enough conviction can disrupt an entire system built on hoping no one pays attention. Poker and the gaming industry as a whole has a public defender now. As long as Lele is willing to carry this banner, the fight against phantom taxes and regulatory overreach has a real chance to win. As she continues pushing, writing, lobbying, rallying the community, and gaining allies and fans, one thing is clear: the future of poker and the gaming industry as a whole has an unflinching advocate willing to go all in.